Friday, December 19, 2014 Kislev 27, 5775

The Diaspora Must Never Forget Jerusalem

February 14, 2008 By:
Morton A. Klein
Posted In 
Comment0
Enlarge Image »

Do Jews outside Israel have the right to criticize Israeli policies relating to defense and security matters or eternal issues, like concessions on Jerusalem?

Some argue that while Diaspora Jews may debate a range of Israeli policies, national security and defense policies should be debated only by Israelis, seeing that only Israelis directly reap the benefits -- or pay the price -- of such decisions. But this conclusion does not follow from the premise.

I agree that Israelis alone have the right and obligation to decide what Israel should do in life-and-death questions of national security and defense. But this does not mean that Diaspora Jews cannot contribute by debate and criticism to the evolution of the decisions that Israel takes. On the contrary, the onus is upon those who disagree to explain why Diaspora Jews, on matters of vital importance to the future of Israel and the Jewish people, should suddenly be struck dumb.

The legitimacy and importance of Diaspora Jewish participation in Israeli debates is all the stronger when the subject is Jerusalem. Here, we are not only talking of Israel's capital but about the central inheritance of all the Jewish people.

Jerusalem is our holiest city, mentioned more than 600 times in the Bible, and referred or alluded to in dozens of prayers. Major Jewish rituals, including the conclusion of the Passover seder and Yom Kippur, end with the age-old affirmation, "Next year in Jerusalem." And these prayers and rituals refer to the historic Old City with the Temple Mount in eastern Jerusalem -- precisely the areas that Palestinians are demanding that Israel give up -- not the modern suburbs of western Jerusalem.

Jerusalem is also the only city in the word in which Jews have formed a majority since the middle of the 19th century.

Against all that, Jerusalem is not mentioned once in the Koran, nor has it ever served as a Muslim or Arab capital. During the years of Jordan's illegal occupation of eastern Jerusalem (1948-67), the 58 synagogues there were destroyed, and Jewish gravestones were used to pave Jordanian army latrines. Despite signed agreements, Jordan did not permit Jews to visit Jerusalem's holy sites. The city became a backwater; Amman remained the Jordanian capital.

Any division of Jerusalem would also endanger Israel by introducing terrorists within rocket and rifle range of the western half of the city. Just as Sederot near Gaza has been subjected to years of incessant missile and mortar fire from territory handed over to the Palestinian Authority -- resulting in almost half its citizenry leaving for safety -- the rest of Jerusalem could share the same fate if the eastern half of the city were given to P.A. control.

And, of course, if concessions are made over Jerusalem's holy sites, one can only imagine -- after witnessing the torching and destruction of Joseph's Tomb and the Jericho synagogues, once Israeli forces were withdrawn -- what fate lies in store for Jewish sites once the P.A. obtains control.

Actually, we do not even need to imagine -- the Muslim wakf, which controls Jerusalem's Temple Mount, has undertaken renovations and construction programs that have already destroyed priceless Jewish antiquities on that site.

Various P.A. officials over the years have also denied the Jewish religious and historical connection to the city. Yasser Arafat once said that "that is not the Western Wall at all, but a Muslim shrine."

Contrary to what is often asserted, American Jewish opposition to the redivision of Jerusalem reflects the expressed views of the Israeli public. An October 2007 Tami Steinmetz Center/Tel Aviv University poll has shown that a clear majority of Jewish Israelis -- 59 percent to 33 percent -- oppose, even in return for a peace agreement, Israel handing over to the P.A. Arab neighborhoods in the eastern half of Jerusalem.

And this likely reflects the feelings of most Jews throughout the world. Jerusalem is part of our heart and soul. It has great historical and religious significance to Jews, no matter where they live.

That is why Israel is morally obligated to take all of world Jewry's feelings into consideration when it comes to this critical issue. As Eli Wiesel said, "Jerusalem for me is above politics. It represents our collective soul."

Morton A. Klein is national president of the Zionist Organization of America.


Comments on this Article

Advertisement