Subscribe To our E-Newsletter
Groups Urge Further Review of Hagel’s Statements
WASHINGTON — Two Jewish groups are calling for a further review of Chuck Hagel’s record in light of an account of a 2007 speech in which he allegedly said the U.S. State Department acted as an “adjunct” of Israel’s Foreign Ministry.
The American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League want Hagel, President Barack Obama’s nominee for defense secretary, to explain the remarks.
Hagel has the support of a majority of senators, but confirmation of his nomination was blocked on Feb. 14 by several Republican senators exercising their power to hold any vote.
“Chuck Hagel has served this country, and his state, with distinction, as we have had the privilege to tell him in person,” the American Jewish Committee said in a statement Feb. 15. “But in light of his complex record in the Senate and controversial statements he has made since his public service on strategic and political affairs — notably grappling with the range of pressing Middle East issues — AJC believes that further Senate deliberation is called for before any final vote is taken.”
The Washington Free Beacon reported Feb. 14, in a posting just hours before the failed bid in the Senate, an account of a Hagel speech delivered in 2007 at Rutgers University.
Blogger George Ajjan, sympathetic to Hagel’s foreign policy, quoted him as saying, “The State Department has become adjunct to the Israeli foreign minister’s office.” Hagel then was a Republican senator from Nebraska contemplating a run for president.
The AJC statement alluded to that revelation. “Moreover, reports are now circulating that the nominee purportedly spoke derisively in recent years of U.S. policy-making regarding Israel and the vital U.S.-Israel relationship,” it said. “Thus, we feel it especially important that Sen. Hagel be given a full opportunity to clear the air, so that the Senate can have a more thorough picture of the nominee’s views.”
Abraham Foxman, the ADL’s national director, also called for Hagel to explain the remark. “If it is true, it is very disturbing,” Foxman said. “If he didn’t say it, it behooves him to tell friends and detractors that he didn’t say it.”